Please enable JavaScript in your browser to experience all the custom features of our site.

Mr. Harry Skydell, Chairman
Mr. Mark Karasick, Vice Chairman
Rabbi Yakov Horowitz, Director
Rabbi Avrohom M. Gluck, Director of Operations
The first 1000 members will have a chance to win a
16 GB
with Rabbi Horowitz audio

Membership Benefits:

  • Save articles to your favorites folder.
  • Save and print selected articles in a PDF journal.
  • Receive emails containing the latest comments on your favorite articles.
  • Mark articles as "READ".
  • More member features coming soon...

Raffle Rules:

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. To enter, complete the signup form and join as a member. Incomplete entries will be disqualified. All entries shall become the property of CJFL. CJFL is not responsible for lost, misdirected or delayed entries.

The contest is open to the general public. Members need to be at least 18 years old. Identification must be produced on request. Employees of CJFL, its raffle sponsor, advertising and promotional agencies and their respective affiliates and associates and such employees' immediate family members and persons with whom such employees are domiciled are excluded from this raffle. ALL PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED MEMBERS WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED INTO THIS RAFFLE. The prize is not redeemable in cash and must be accepted as awarded. Decisions of the raffle judges are final - no substitutions will be available. By claiming the prize, the winner authorizes the use, without additional compensation of his or her name and/or likeness (first initial and last name) and municipality of residence for promotion and/or advertising purposes in any manner and in any medium (including without limitation, radio broadcasts, newspapers and other publications and in television or film releases, slides, videotape, distribution over the internet and picture date storage) which CJFL may deem appropriate. In accepting the prize, the winner, acknowledges that CJFL may not be held liable for any loss, damages or injury associated with accepting or using this prize. CJFL retains the rights, in its absolute and sole discretion, to make substitutions of equivalent kind or approximate value in the event of the unavailability of any prize or component of the prize for any reason whatsoever. This contest is subject to all federal, provincial and municipal laws. CJFL reserves the right to withdraw or terminate this raffle at any time without prior notice. One entry per person.

Fellow Weekly Newsletter - Issue 32 - The Red Wedding Gown - Business Law and Ethics for the Shabbos Table

Reprinted from Fellow Weekly Newsletter

  Rated by 1 user   |   Viewed 8970 times since 1/22/10   |   0 Comments
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size    [ Change Font Size ] Email This Article to a Friend


Fellow Weekly – Issue 32

Welcome to Fellow Weekly!

Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals.

This issue is dedicated by the students of Chaim Kalman Shamai ben Dinah. Please daven for his speedy and full recovery.

CASE 133: The Red Wedding Gown

The most popular staff member on the university campus in the Upper Galilee was none other than Linda – the baker. She left to the United States for two-weeks to visit her mother, Mrs. Bloom, in Evanston, Illinois. Linda scheduled her trip so that she could return to Israel on Monday, two days before the wedding of her sister-in-law, Sheila.

Sheila had ordered a custom-made wedding gown from the United States and asked Linda if she would mind bringing the gown back with her. Linda was only overjoyed to provide Sheila with this service. In addition, the school was in need of baking equipment, including some heavy rolling pins, which Linda purchased with university funds.

Linda laid out her clothes, the gown in its plastic suit bag, the baking equipment, and a jar of Heinz™ barbeque sauce that she had purchased for herself. Mrs. Bloom had a knack for packing, so she gladly packed up Linda's two suitcases. Linda relied on her mother's expertise and took the baggage without checking her mother's work.

Linda checked in at O'Hare International Airport and boarded the plane. Already on the tarmac, the plane was called back due to security concerns. The flight was postponed and Linda spent the night at an airport hotel. The rest of the trip was uneventful. Linda's flight departed the next day and arrived at Ben Gurion Airport on Tuesday evening, a day and a half before the wedding.

However, when she came home and opened her suitcase, she was horrified by what she saw. The front of Sheila's gown was white no more! The rolling pins had punctured the barbeque sauce. Red barbeque sauce had seeped through the zipper of the suit bag and heavily stained the front of Sheila's gown.

The local dry cleaners had already closed for the day, so Linda brought the gown in first thing in the morning. “Please have the gown ready this afternoon,” she begged. “The wedding is tomorrow morning.”

“If you would have brought it in yesterday we could have done it for you at the regular price,” responded the manager. “We can do a ‘rush job' today, but it will cost you double.”

- Who pays for the cleaning job?

- Who pays for the additional cost of the “rush job”?

What is the law?

[Based on a true story - Submitted by Mrs. A.K. dorm mother, Jerusalem]

Please email us with your comments and answers at
Read next week's issue for the answer!


Joey and Jacky were great friends. They boarded together in a small high school nestled between the towering snowcapped Colorado Rockies. On Friday afternoons, the boys would often order special Shabbat treats from the nearby town. One week, Joey ordered a twenty-dollar tray of potato kugel from Dave's Delicatessen.

When Jacky heard that Joey had ordered an entire tray of kugel – twenty slices in all – he offered to give Joey ten dollars for half of the tray. Joey agreed.

Joey's friend Harvey was going into town that Friday to visit with an elderly gentleman in the nursing home and offered to pick up the kugel for the two boys. However, when he returned, Joey was surprised at the size of the package. It had his name on it, but upon opening it, he discovered that it contained forty pieces – double what they had paid for.

Joey, being honest, immediately called the delicatessen and informed them of the error.

“It was our mistake,” the manager told him over the phone. “Keep it. The loss is on us!”

With that, Joey brought the tray to Jacky's room, and gave him his ten pieces.

Jacky glanced back at the remaining thirty pieces in Joey's tray. “Hey Joey, why do you get thirty pieces, while I only got ten? I paid ten dollars for half a kugel!”

Joey responded, “Jacky, you paid ten dollars for ten pieces. I got lucky and received an extra twenty pieces. That has nothing to do with you.”

- How many pieces do Jacky and Joey deserve, respectively?

- Is Harvey owed a share of the bonus?

What is the law?

[Submitted by Rabbi M. Marcus and the students of the Belle Harbor Yeshiva, NY]

The Answer

We present you here with a concise ruling. For a more intricate elucidation, please see the “detailed explanation” below.

The allotment of the kugel would depend upon the arrangement between Joey and Jacky. If Joey and Jacky jointly purchased the kugel from Dave's Delicatessen, they would then receive twenty pieces each. If Joey purchased the kugel himself and merely sold a portion of it to Jacky, Joey would retain the extra pieces.

Harvey does not receive a share in the additional pieces of kugel.

Detailed Explanation

Joey and Jacky

Joey and Jacky purchased a twenty-piece kugel. Upon receiving the extra pieces, they did not automatically own them. They belonged to Dave's Delicatessen. Joey and Jacky had a mitzvah of Hashavat Aveidah, an obligation to contact the owner of the “lost item” and notify him of its whereabouts.

If Joey or Jacky would keep the pieces of kugel without informing the delicatessen of their error, they would be guilty of transgressing three mitzvot: the positive commandment to return a lost object (Deuteronomy 22:1); and two negative prohibitions, 1) ignoring one's lost object (ibid. 22:3) and 2) theft (Leviticus 19:13). [Choshen Mishpat 259:1]

Indeed, Joey fulfilled his duty by merely calling Dave's delicatessen and informing them of their error. [Shulchan Aruch Harav: Hilchos Aveidah 13]

The change of ownership occurred when the store manager told them “keep it, the loss is on us”.

We can assume that the manager awarded the additional pieces to his customer. The question remains as to who is the actual customer:

There are two possibilities, which are dependant upon their understanding at the time they began the venture. If Joey and Jacky had purchased the kugel as a business partnership; they would then equally divide the additional twenty pieces. If, however, Joey himself purchased the kugel and then like a retailer sold a portion to Jacky, Joey would then retain the original pieces, as he was the original customer.

Another application would be if a mishap occurred prior to the delivery of Jacky's share. In the case of a joint purchase, Jacky and Joey would share the loss; if Joey alone had purchased the kugel, he would be required to fully absorb any damages.


Although a service provider generally splits a received bonus with a client

[Choshen Mishpat 183:6] (see Issue 29), Harvey would not receive any share of the kugel. Joey and Jacky (or possibly just Joey, depending on the nature of the purchase) received the bonus from the delicatessen over the phone. The extra pieces had nothing to do with Harvey's efforts and Dave intended to award it to his customers, not to the fellow who picked it up. As a result, Harvey would not receive anything.

[Answered by the Fellow-Yesharim Research Center]

Comments or questions? Have a case to submit? Please send us an email at

The Fellow-Yesharim Research Center, located in the heart of Jerusalem is presently studying its eighth phase of employer / employee breach of contract (Bava Metzia 75b-77b).


Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.

To join this mailing list, send an email to with the word "SUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

To sign up for Rabbi Horowitz’s weekly emails, please click here.

Reader's Comments:      Rating & Comments Policy      Rate & Write a Comment!
 Average Rating:              Rated by 1 user
Subscribe to this Article
(by subscribing you will receive email notification
when new comments are posted)
There are no comments yet. Click above to write the first comment.
Dear Readers:

Please visit our Parenting Resource listing to learn about agencies and services that you can make use of. If you know of an agency that can be of assistance to others, kindly drop an email to our site administrator at and pass along the information to him.

I ask that you please consider supporting the work we are doing to improve the lives of our children. Click on these links to learn more about our teen and parent mentoring program that serves hundreds of teens and their families, or our KESHER program, now in 20 schools in 4 states. Your financial support can allow us to expand these services and help more children.

If you believe in the governing principles of this website – to help effect positive change through the candid discussions of the real issues we collectively face, please consider becoming a daily, weekly or monthly sponsor of this website and help defray the costs of it’s maintenance.

Working with Families and Educators on Behalf of our Children

This site is managed by The Center for Jewish Family Life, Inc., 56 Briarcliff Drive, Monsey, NY 10952
Project Y.E.S. was founded by Agudath Israel of America
The Center for Jewish Family Life/Project YES - 56 Briarcliff Drive, Monsey, NY 10952 (845) 352-7100 ext. 114 Fax: (845) 352-9593