Please enable JavaScript in your browser to experience all the custom features of our site.

RabbiHorowitz.com
Please Use Our New Website
still under constructions
to purchase safety books and educational materials
https://thebrightbeginnings.com

Mr. Harry Skydell, Chairman
Mr. Mark Karasick, Vice Chairman
Rabbi Yakov Horowitz, Director
Rabbi Avrohom M. Gluck, Director of Operations
The first 1000 members will have a chance to win a
16 GB
iPod
touch
with Rabbi Horowitz audio

Membership Benefits:

  • Save articles to your favorites folder.
  • Save and print selected articles in a PDF journal.
  • Receive emails containing the latest comments on your favorite articles.
  • Mark articles as "READ".
  • More member features coming soon...

Raffle Rules:

NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. To enter, complete the signup form and join as a member. Incomplete entries will be disqualified. All entries shall become the property of CJFL. CJFL is not responsible for lost, misdirected or delayed entries.

The contest is open to the general public. Members need to be at least 18 years old. Identification must be produced on request. Employees of CJFL, its raffle sponsor, advertising and promotional agencies and their respective affiliates and associates and such employees' immediate family members and persons with whom such employees are domiciled are excluded from this raffle. ALL PREVIOUSLY REGISTERED MEMBERS WILL BE AUTOMATICALLY ENTERED INTO THIS RAFFLE. The prize is not redeemable in cash and must be accepted as awarded. Decisions of the raffle judges are final - no substitutions will be available. By claiming the prize, the winner authorizes the use, without additional compensation of his or her name and/or likeness (first initial and last name) and municipality of residence for promotion and/or advertising purposes in any manner and in any medium (including without limitation, radio broadcasts, newspapers and other publications and in television or film releases, slides, videotape, distribution over the internet and picture date storage) which CJFL may deem appropriate. In accepting the prize, the winner, acknowledges that CJFL may not be held liable for any loss, damages or injury associated with accepting or using this prize. CJFL retains the rights, in its absolute and sole discretion, to make substitutions of equivalent kind or approximate value in the event of the unavailability of any prize or component of the prize for any reason whatsoever. This contest is subject to all federal, provincial and municipal laws. CJFL reserves the right to withdraw or terminate this raffle at any time without prior notice. One entry per person.


Areivim - Intellectual and Emotional Knowlege - Part One
by Rabbi Shmuel Gluck

  Rated by 2 users   |   Viewed 8736 times since 1/22/10   |   2 Comments
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size    [ Change Font Size ] Email This Article to a Friend
   

1/22/10

Rabbi Shmuel Gluck is the Director of Areivim, an organization that offers counseling, crisis intervention and referral services for teens and their families.

Intellectual and Emotional Knowledge – Part 1

I recently saw a family walking on the street on Shabbos. As they neared a home, they heard a dog barking behind a fence. Two of the family members crossed to the other side of the street. I wondered why. The dog was behind the fence. In the unlikely event that the dog would escape as they passed, crossing the street wouldn’t offer them much additional protection.

People make decisions and draw conclusions from both an intellectual and emotional angle. There are many differences between the decisions that originate from the intellect and those that originate from the emotion. For instance, in the above scenario the difference is glaring. On an intellectual level there’s no reason to cross the street, but on an emotional level, people feel safer having a greater distance between themselves and a dog and this is why I believe they crossed the street.

Although the decision to cross the street may not help them, it also doesn’t hurt them. Therefore, if they feel better by crossing the street, they should. In this situation acting on their emotions is harmless. However, there are other situations in which acting on one’s emotions may hurt them.

There are three basic differences between one’s intellect and emotion. The first is that emotional people can’t think methodically. Emotional people may make decisions even though “A” doesn’t always lead to “B”. For example, a person may be very upset about an incident that just happened and may feel (feeling is often the reaction of the emotion) the need to ask another person to stay up all night to talk about the problem.

When I ask that person what he gained by repeating the incident to the second person from 15 different angles, has no real answer for me. The next morning he’ll not only still be upset, but he’ll also be tired and unable to fulfill his daily responsibilities. In addition, because he’s tired, he’s placed his job, something that he really enjoys, at risk.

Here’s where it gets tricky. The perception of a need may actually create such a need. If the person feels that he needs to stay up for hours and lament his situation because his emotions say that he should, then doing so may actually help him feel better. The price that he may have to pay may be a tangible one, such as being too tired to fulfill his daily responsibilities. His “crossing the street to avoid the barking dog” may actually cause him more problems than he presently has.

On the other hand, intellectual thought would conclude, “I’m not doing well right now. Nevertheless, I need to do what I can to make the situation more bearable. Staying up all night may make me feel better but it’s not really a smart thing to do. My job is something which offers me stability and isn’t something that I should place at risk”.

Many people have told me that they want to help friends in trouble. When I ask them how they think their efforts will help, they usually respond that, “They probably won’t, but at least I’m doing something”. This is an emotional response, and not an intellectual one.

The second difference is that emotions often create, risks that aren’t real. In my opening scenario, there’s really no risk of the dog getting through the fence. However, people can fear things that have little, or no, chance of taking place.

For instance, some parents say that they’re afraid to allow their children to stay in a school dormitory because it’s very far away. When I ask the parents about their specific concerns, they describe fears that have nothing to do with the distance. “They may get sick” or “They may go to a mall without the school knowing about it”. These two concerns, although they may be legitimate, can also take place, and often do, while the children are at home.

Even if the risk of becoming sick or roaming unsupervised actually does increase while in a dormitory environment, emotions are unable to assess the level of risk and compare it to the possible advantages offered by accepting those risks. Although emotions go through a checklist of possible options and risks and may see everything as having equal value, the truth is that emotions don’t assess all gains and risks equally. This causes people to give up opportunities that offer significant chances of success, because of potential problems that do not represent significant risks.

Emotions base risks on their emotional factors. Falling off a tall building is a gripping fear, even though it hardly ever happens. Sending children thousands of miles away is scary. Emotions can’t accept that the potential advantages of a dormitory environment. Having their son introduced to great Rabbeim, should override those fears. Being overly concerned with risk can cause people to make unwise decisions.

Intellect tells people to “step back” and consider not only the risks but the level of risks, and the chances of those risks happening. Acting on a risk which is based on the percentages of risk vs. gain, allows for a rational decision to be made.

The third difference is that emotion doesn’t appreciate the concept of time. People can think about past incidents which dramatically affected their lives, and they can, for that moment, imagine them with the same intensity as when they first happened. This is often referred to as flashbacks.

In addition to the terrible discomfort of being haunted by flashbacks, they cause people to make wrong decisions. The fear of something that’s long gone is given the importance of a present concern. Peoples’ self esteem, for instance, can be effected by incidents that happened long age. They still see themselves as being the ones that failed or were abused.

Instead, when one has a flashback, one should think, “That incident was terrible, but it happened 3 years ago and I need to place it within my past, not my present. I’m not that person anymore”. By placing an incident in its proper place in time, one can remove the emotional intensity of the incident. After repeated reminders, the flashbacks will become nothing more than distant memories.

To be continued….

For more information about Areivim or for copies of this or other articles please contact us by phone at 845-371-2760 or by e-mail at Areivim@juno.com



To sign up for Rabbi Horowitz’s weekly emails, please click here.


Reader's Comments:      Rating & Comments Policy      Rate & Write a Comment!
 Average Rating:              Rated by 2 users    (2 comments)
Subscribe to this Article
(by subscribing you will receive email notification
when new comments are posted)
There are no comments yet. Click above to write the first comment.
Dear Readers:

Please visit our Parenting Resource listing to learn about agencies and services that you can make use of. If you know of an agency that can be of assistance to others, kindly drop an email to our site administrator at admin@RabbiHorowitz.com and pass along the information to him.

I ask that you please consider supporting the work we are doing to improve the lives of our children. Click on these links to learn more about our teen and parent mentoring program that serves hundreds of teens and their families, or our KESHER program, now in 20 schools in 4 states. Your financial support can allow us to expand these services and help more children.

If you believe in the governing principles of this website – to help effect positive change through the candid discussions of the real issues we collectively face, please consider becoming a daily, weekly or monthly sponsor of this website and help defray the costs of it’s maintenance.



Working with Families and Educators on Behalf of our Children

This site is managed by The Center for Jewish Family Life, Inc., 56 Briarcliff Drive, Monsey, NY 10952
Project Y.E.S. was founded by Agudath Israel of America
The Center for Jewish Family Life/Project YES - 56 Briarcliff Drive, Monsey, NY 10952 (845) 352-7100 ext. 114 Fax: (845) 352-9593
email: email@kosherjewishparenting.com


Advertisements