Fellow Weekly - Issue 57
Welcome to Fellow Weekly!
Encouraging intelligent and entertaining debate at your Shabbos table. Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals. To join this mailing list, please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org with the word subscribe in the subject line.
CASE 157: Popped Justice
After proofreading his lengthy article on Intellectual Property (IP), Justice Fritz Sherman stepped out of his chambers to get some fresh air and to clear his mind. Strolling about the freshly mowed park outside the Sullivan County courthouse, Justice Sherman stopped at the vending machine to purchase can of cold Sprite, selling for 75 cents.
Justice Sherman inserted one dollar and pressed the Sprite button. With his black robe rustling in the steady breeze, Sherman bent down graciously to pick up his purchase and retrieve his change. Much to his dismay, he struck a windfall. Out fell 50 cents and two cans of Sprite.
Unsure of how to proceed, Sherman thought to himself, "Who is going to follow the law if the Judge himself does not follow the law?"
"What should Justice Sherman do with the additional soda pop can and extra change?
Please email us with your comments and answers at email@example.com.
Read next week's issue for the answer!
LAST WEEK'S CASE
CASE 156: Visiting Day
Nine-year-old Benny Miller hung his homemade calendar over his rickety bunk bed. As he laid his weary head down to rest each night, Benny placed a sticker on another exciting day gone by. Though enjoying every minute of his camp experience, Benny launched a countdown to July 11.
On that fateful Sunday morning, Mrs. Miller would make that grueling bumper-to-bumper journey en route from Scranton PA to the Catskills. She'd appear at the camp gate wiping the sweat off her brow, smiling from ear to ear, and giving little Benny a big warm embrace. Mom's hugs and words of encouragement nourished Benny with the courage and self-confidence he needed to succeed. Benny's sparkling blue eyes and responsive beam made Mom's arduous trip worth all of the effort!
Mrs. Miller arrived on the campgrounds early Sunday morning and the two were soon off to spend quality time at a popular shady lookout on Briscoe Rd. overlooking Swan Lake. While the green and brown leaves rustled in the soothing breeze, Benny and Mom tried to avoid eye contact with the untold number of "camp refugees" that arrived from the various area camps to spend some precious private time with their respective visitors about the lake.
As the sun began to dip towards the horizon and the lookout was all but empty, Mrs. Miller and Benny made their way from the lakeside to their white Toyota Prius. Suddenly, Mrs. Miller stopped. "What's the matter Mom?" asked Benny. "Look at this I see on my left. Someone forgot his or her care-package."
Mrs. Miller bent down, opened the tan bag and found five disposable cameras, one amber pair of Swedish goggles, a new pair of grey imitation crocks, a thirty dollar prepaid calling card, a dairy crumb cake, and a note on the back of a photo, which read,
"Dear Dani, Sorry we could not make it this year. Turn this note over and smile back at your new baby sister. She will be waiting for you back home.
Love Mom and Dad."
"What should I do?" wondered Mrs. Miller out loud.
"If I leave the package here, it may get stolen or tossed in the trash. While if I
bring the care-package back with me to our small close-knit Scranton community
and attempt to locate the owner from home, Dani will probably need to swim with
his eyes closed and wait till he returns home to get acquainted with his new baby sister?"
What is the law?
Mrs. Miller may not leave the care package in the unprotected parking lot. She must pick it up, responsibly publicize the find, try to ensure that the contents do not become valueless in the interim, and bother to fulfill the Mitzvah of Hashavat Aveidah. She need not compromise on prior social responsibilities or incur losses of any kind in fulfiling her duties. (If she has reason to believe that she will not be compensated for her losses, she is indemnified from pursuing the issue.)
[Please see Detailed Explanation as to how she should go about carrying out her duties].
Visiting Day implicates the following eight laws.
1. Generally, the owner cannot despair from retrieving an article without discovering the loss.
2. As long as the owner has not despaired, one may not leave an identifiable object in an unprotected area.
3. Identifying features include unique size, shape, weight, packaging, and quantity as well as other non-standard features [Choshen Mishpat 259:3, 262:3].
4. The finder should publicize the find in a manner through which it is reasonably possible for the loser to see the posting. Examples are local public billboards, synagogues, local circulars and media venues [Choshen Mishpat 267: 3].
5. The mitzvah of Hashavat Aveidah requires the finder to care for the article and take measures that the article does not depreciate in the interim [Choshen Mishpat 267: 17]. Assuming the article has no sentimental value, if it will depreciate considerably before the finder is able to return it, the finder may convert the item into its present cash value and use it [Choshen Mishpat 267: 21].
If the finder has no use for the article, he or she must sell it and return the cash value to the rightful owner [Mishna Berura 443: 11]. Nevertheless, if the finder does not sell it, he or she is not liable to compensate the loser for the loss [ibid].
6. The finder must inconvenience him/herself and extend a reasonable effort to return the lost article [Choshen Mishpat
7. Nevertheless, the finder need not incur a financial loss in the effort to return the article. Losses are not limited to finances. For example, one need not compromise on other social responsibilities to perform Hashavat Aveidah. Nevertheless, one who is perpetually stingy about helping others will become cruel and eventually become needy whereby having to come on to others [Choshen Mishpat 267: 1].
Thus, as long as pursuing the owner remains a bother but does not yet cause the finder a "loss", the finder is required to do so. The Torah leaves the balance between the two extremes to the finder's responsible discretion.
8. The finder must keep unclaimed items under his or her guard until Elijah comes and identifies the owner [Choshen Mishpat 267: 15]. However, one need not keep a commonly accessible item ad infinitum. Instead, one may 'purchase it' from the claimant and put the purchase money aside until the coming of Elijah [Igros Moshe].
The parcel Mrs. Miller found still belongs to Dani's parents. If Dani received the parcel, it is possible that he is too young to legally despair from retrieving it. If Dani never received the package, his parents do not know that it was lost and as such did not despair. Thus, Mrs. Miller cannot leave the item be nor may she keep it for herself.
While most of the articles in the package are standard, the contents of the care-package as a unit were unique.
Thus, providing the content information is equivalent to providing unique identifying features worthy of retrieving the article.
Care for the article:
Included in Hashavat Aveidah is seeing that the article not become valueless. Thus, if Mrs. Miller reasonably assumes that the dairy cake will spoil before retrieved, she should freeze it. Or else, she may buy it, enjoy it and leave its monetary equivalent.
Practically Publicizing Find:
Initially in the days of the Temple, we had a national central Hashavat Aveidah station. Once we dispersed throughout the Diaspora, publicizing in the locale of the find was the recommended and most practical manner of fulfilling one's duty. Thus, the local synagogue took on the compromised role of the national central meeting station.
Accordingly, leaving a note near the place of find and publicizing the find in one of the local camps could be sufficient. Thus, Mrs. Miller could give the parcel in to Benny's camp office and see to it that the office staff publicize the loss and return the package to the claimant who can define all the items in the package.
This is a simple approach which would not infringe on Mrs. Miller's social responsibilities back home in Scranton and would complying with the initial Diaspora protocol. (Arguably spending the night going through the hundreds of camps in the area would compromise on her duties back home.)
However, the great advances in transportation, a product of the industrial revolution, created challenges in locating losers by simply posting a note in the local area of find. Thus, while Mrs. Miller might not be required to do more, posting the loss in one camp will barely assist the loser if Dani is a camper in a different camp.
Nevertheless, the industrial revolution produced its own solutions. The legendary 19th century Halachic adjudicator, Rabbi Moshe Sofer a.k.a the Hatam Sofer ruled that the modern day equivalent to local synagogue posting is posting in a popular local newspaper [Choshen Mishpat responsa 122].
Arguably, today the use of the central HashavasAveidah.com site and providing Benny's camp information would afford the most effective way of publicizing the find.
Hopefully, Dani's parents would notice the posting sooner or later and pursue its retrieval.
As noted, Mrs. Miller should not leave the care package in the unprotected parking lot. Thus, if leaving it with the camp staff is not an option, she should take the package home with her, post the information on HashavasAveidah.com and safeguard the package until Dani's parents legally retrieve it.
Returning the Package
Mrs. Miller is not required to spend money to reunite the parcel with Dani's parents. Thus, Mrs. Miller is only required to send the parcel in the mail to Dani's parents, if they will pay for the incurred costs. If Mrs. Miller is unsure if they will do so, she is not required to send the package to them.
[Answered by the Fellow -Yesharim Research Center]
Note: Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.
To join this mailing list, please send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org with the word subscribe in the subject line.
A project of Fellow-Yesharim 105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet, Jerusalem ISRAEL 02-581-6337 USA 845-335-5516
To sign up for Rabbi Horowitz’s weekly emails, please click here.